Skip to main content


Are you ready to go down the rabbit hole? To visit a surreal world, where black is white and white is carrots?

A friend, Metacognician in Shanghai, describes the situation as follows: “Life is more absurd than movies. I've gone down the rabbit hole too, when it just becomes more and more strange and you wonder how that all is supposed to make sense.” I asked him if I should just embrace it. He answered, “Why should you ... change the universe?”

It started with a psychotic named Jim Kiraly who resides, we think, at 6329 Twinberry Circle, Avila Beach, California.

Jim Kiraly is a respected citizen. A churchgoer. A Vice President of Transamerica Corporation. And a violent abuser who tried to use an emergency anti-violence measure, one intended to protect battered women, to stop his victim in a wheelchair from writing a book.

Concise enough? :)

For attorneys: Jim Kiraly filed for CLETS against his son and victim, who lived 200 miles away, did not own a car, and was in a wheelchair. His son and victim was not asked to end communications. Jim had no (zero) specific and relevant allegations that were not perjury. But he turned down repeated offers of no-contact and a signed stipulation that gave him everything but CLETS. He insisted on CLETS if his victim ever once “discussed” him with third parties.

In the end, Jim Kiraly signed an agreement far weaker than the ones he'd been offered.

A review of Court paperwork and other materials will tend to confirm that Jim and other parties, including attorneys on all sides, committed multiple felonies, crimes, and faux pas. :P

The word “abuser” is stated here publicly and without equivocation. A formal offer is hereby made to reaffirm the word in writing and under oath. Attorneys will understand the significance of the point. In short, there is little terror of a threatened defamation suit on this side. Actually, we feel that such a suit will fit nicely up Jim Kiraly's abuser ass.

Jim has one son, Ken Kiraly, who invented the Amazon Kindle and is one of the leads at Amazon's secret Lab126. Another son, Tom Kiraly is one of the leads, a Vice President-CFO type, at medical insurance firms, including one of the largest, Humana Corporation.

These people and some of the biggest names in Silicon Valley legal circles have committed or are involved in multiple crimes.

For the next decade or two, we're going to explore the crimes that these people committed, the motivations and the denial involved, the background and histories that led each person to make the choices that they did, and ways to build upon what happened and move towards positive societal goals.

There's plenty to go over. These people committed or were involved in: Spousal abuse, child abuse, DDOS (a highly prosecutable violation of CFAA), extortion, perjury, conspiracy to commit perjury (a possible felony), false police reports, conspiracy to file false police reports (a possible felony), unlawful threats, barratry, defamation, malpractice, civil harassment, criminal harassment, abuse of process, and violations of SCCBA Professional Standards.

The point was to force Jim's oldest son and victim, me, to sign a gag order. I was in a wheelchair. I'd never made a single inappropriate threat against my abuser. I wasn't even asked to not to call anybody. But Jim threatened to put me in a violence database unless I agreed never to write about him.

I won the right to write, but I lost my home of 25 years, most of my possessions, my chances for retirement, everything. Everything but a realization.

I can make a difference. I can conduct research for legitimate and reasonable purposes, document what happened, and analyze the choices of the people involved:

Maggie told me that she didn't know what she could say to me about what happened. However, we have decades to work it out. It will be productive. I'd like to direct the attention of attorneys and other parties to the:

Legitimate and Reasonable Purposes List

Questions or comments are welcome. For technical notes and disclaimers, click here.

Free Downloads

The current free ebook is located at this link:

For details about the ebook, click here.

The point? “The story is already out there, idiots. Keep it up and I'll demonstrate how something known as decentralized distribution works.”


Spring 2013 — Free Speech Memorandum

People are invited to review the unusual document linked below. See the Disclaimer before downloading.

The document is believed to have cost about $5,000 though the figure may be low or high.

My attorney was supposed to file a Motion to Limit Scope. He indicated initially that the Motion would only cost about a hundred dollars. In the end, the more complicated document that you'll find linked below was produced.

The idea was that the document was supposed to obtain fees for me prior to the end of the legal cases. Odd point, though; when I asked my attorney about the fees issue as things progressed, this being the primary justification for the project, he seemed to have forgotten that the issue had been discussed. When I pressed the point, my attorney acknowledged that he'd talked about this, but the subject seemed to make him uncomfortable.

In the end, if I understand what happened correctly, the Court admonished my attorney for submitting the document. My attorney told me that it was a success regardless.

Actually, speaking as a lay person, the document strikes me as relevant and interesting. My attorney invested genuine effort in this. Additionally, his body language during the hearing involved suggested that he was startled. He didn't expect things to go as badly as they did.

So I spoke as gently as possible to him about the matter. But I'd have liked the document better if hadn't cost me thousands of dollars and it hadn't been dismissed in about 60 seconds.

To read the document, Robert's Free Speech Folly, use the link below. The link goes to a PDF file. Note: PDF files don't work with some browsers and/or mobile devices.

Disclaimer: The link goes to a draft and not to an Endorsed as Filed copy of the Memorandum. The document is not represented to be anything but an unmodified copy of a draft that was provided to me by my attorney which, I am led to believe, was ultimately filed with the Court, possibly in some other form. The exact cost is not presently known.

Click here for Free Speech Memorandum PDF