Skip to main content


Are you ready to go down the rabbit hole? To visit a surreal world, where black is white and white is carrots?

A friend, Metacognician in Shanghai, describes the situation as follows: “Life is more absurd than movies. I've gone down the rabbit hole too, when it just becomes more and more strange and you wonder how that all is supposed to make sense.” I asked him if I should just embrace it. He answered, “Why should you ... change the universe?”

It started with a psychotic named Jim Kiraly who resides, we think, at 6329 Twinberry Circle, Avila Beach, California.

Jim Kiraly is a respected citizen. A churchgoer. A Vice President of Transamerica Corporation. And a violent abuser who tried to use an emergency anti-violence measure, one intended to protect battered women, to stop his victim in a wheelchair from writing a book.

Concise enough? :)

For attorneys: Jim Kiraly filed for CLETS against his son and victim, who lived 200 miles away, did not own a car, and was in a wheelchair. His son and victim was not asked to end communications. Jim had no (zero) specific and relevant allegations that were not perjury. But he turned down repeated offers of no-contact and a signed stipulation that gave him everything but CLETS. He insisted on CLETS if his victim ever once “discussed” him with third parties.

In the end, Jim Kiraly signed an agreement far weaker than the ones he'd been offered.

A review of Court paperwork and other materials will tend to confirm that Jim and other parties, including attorneys on all sides, committed multiple felonies, crimes, and faux pas. :P

The word “abuser” is stated here publicly and without equivocation. A formal offer is hereby made to reaffirm the word in writing and under oath. Attorneys will understand the significance of the point. In short, there is little terror of a threatened defamation suit on this side. Actually, we feel that such a suit will fit nicely up Jim Kiraly's abuser ass.

Jim has one son, Ken Kiraly, who invented the Amazon Kindle and is one of the leads at Amazon's secret Lab126. Another son, Tom Kiraly is one of the leads, a Vice President-CFO type, at medical insurance firms, including one of the largest, Humana Corporation.

These people and some of the biggest names in Silicon Valley legal circles have committed or are involved in multiple crimes.

For the next decade or two, we're going to explore the crimes that these people committed, the motivations and the denial involved, the background and histories that led each person to make the choices that they did, and ways to build upon what happened and move towards positive societal goals.

There's plenty to go over. These people committed or were involved in: Spousal abuse, child abuse, DDOS (a highly prosecutable violation of CFAA), extortion, perjury, conspiracy to commit perjury (a possible felony), false police reports, conspiracy to file false police reports (a possible felony), unlawful threats, barratry, defamation, malpractice, civil harassment, criminal harassment, abuse of process, and violations of SCCBA Professional Standards.

The point was to force Jim's oldest son and victim, me, to sign a gag order. I was in a wheelchair. I'd never made a single inappropriate threat against my abuser. I wasn't even asked to not to call anybody. But Jim threatened to put me in a violence database unless I agreed never to write about him.

I won the right to write, but I lost my home of 25 years, most of my possessions, my chances for retirement, everything. Everything but a realization.

I can make a difference. I can conduct research for legitimate and reasonable purposes, document what happened, and analyze the choices of the people involved:

Maggie told me that she didn't know what she could say to me about what happened. However, we have decades to work it out. It will be productive. I'd like to direct the attention of attorneys and other parties to the:

Legitimate and Reasonable Purposes List

Questions or comments are welcome. For technical notes and disclaimers, click here.

Free Downloads

The current free ebook is located at this link:

For details about the ebook, click here.

The point? “The story is already out there, idiots. Keep it up and I'll demonstrate how something known as decentralized distribution works.”


Sunday 2013-01-27 — Kiraly Cases DV150 Filings

For the Kiraly Cases story, click here
Tags: James, Kiraly, Thomas. A full Kiraly Cases tags system will be added in 2014.

These are DV150 filings for the Kiraly Cases; i.e. they're initial responses that I filed shortly after the cases started. They spell out some minor problems with the cases. I'll probably file expanded versions when time permits.

DV120 for James Kiraly Case — Reasons I Do Not Agree

Plaintiff James, my Father, requests an order to stop “stalking” and “harassing” that never occurred. I was asked in December 2011 not to communicate; I complied 100% in 2012 until my Mother abrogated the request. Phone records will show my Father has committed perjury. I asked my family to work with me on a book and said request came immediately after I did this.

Father claims I made “false allegations of child abuse and spousal abuse,” but has lied about me making some allegations, and the allegations I did make are true. An objective witness from outside the family has offered to testify.

There are claims that I demanded medical care, hacked into Father's email, contacted my parents' church, etc. Other than contacting the church, after my Mother gave me permission to do so (Pastor Ron was cordial and the conversation was pleasant) the other allegations are entirely false.

Discovery is continuing. This response will be supplemented with a much longer point by point rebuttal at a later date that will discuss dozens of misrepresentations and actual lies by Father in detail.

DV120 for Thomas Kiraly Case — Reasons I Do Not Agree

Plaintiff Thomas, my brother, requests an order to stop “stalking”, “harassment”, “emotional abuse” and “threats” that never occurred. Additionally, many of Thomas' Declarations are allegations that do not relate to Thomas at all, and about which Thomas has no firsthand knowledge whatsoever. Those allegations are false.

I phoned Thomas on his birthday in 2012. The call was arranged through Thomas's assistant and he took it voluntarily. Thomas has lied about the conversation and about what happened subsequently. He spoke to me voluntarily a few times and stopped taking calls without warning. He states he indicated he didn't want to talk; this is a lie. It took me a long time to realize he hadn't even shown me the respect of telling me not to call.

I left a message saying we at least needed to discuss the disposition of our Grandfather's books, and that I'd talk to his adult children if he didn't want to proceed. He has characterized my offer to give him the books upon my death as extortion and an attempt to harm his livelihood. I am at a loss for words.

This case is about a book I'm writing and my parents' reaction to the book; nothing else. There are too many falsehoods to address here. Discovery is continuing. This response will be supplemented with a much longer point by point rebuttal at a later date that will discuss dozens of misrepresentations and falsehoods by plaintiff in detail.