Are you ready to go down the rabbit hole? To visit a surreal world, where black is white and white is carrots?
A friend, Metacognician in Shanghai, describes the situation as follows: “Life is more absurd than movies. I've gone down the rabbit hole too, when it just becomes more and more strange and you wonder how that all is supposed to make sense.” I asked him if I should just embrace it. He answered, “Why should you ... change the universe?”
It started with a psychotic named Jim Kiraly who resides, we think, at 6329 Twinberry Circle, Avila Beach, California.
Jim Kiraly is a respected citizen. A churchgoer. A Vice President of Transamerica Corporation. And a violent abuser who tried to use an emergency anti-violence measure, one intended to protect battered women, to stop his victim in a wheelchair from writing a book.
Concise enough? :)
For attorneys: Jim Kiraly filed for CLETS against his son and victim, who lived 200 miles away, did not own a car, and was in a wheelchair. His son and victim was not asked to end communications. Jim had no (zero) specific and relevant allegations that were not perjury. But he turned down repeated offers of no-contact and a signed stipulation that gave him everything but CLETS. He insisted on CLETS if his victim ever once “discussed” him with third parties.
In the end, Jim Kiraly signed an agreement far weaker than the ones he'd been offered.
A review of Court paperwork and other materials will tend to confirm that Jim and other parties, including attorneys on all sides, committed multiple felonies, crimes, and faux pas. :P
The word “abuser” is stated here publicly and without equivocation. A formal offer is hereby made to reaffirm the word in writing and under oath. Attorneys will understand the significance of the point. In short, there is little terror of a threatened defamation suit on this side. Actually, we feel that such a suit will fit nicely up Jim Kiraly's abuser ass.
Jim has one son, Ken Kiraly, who invented the Amazon Kindle and is one of the leads at Amazon's secret Lab126. Another son, Tom Kiraly is one of the leads, a Vice President-CFO type, at medical insurance firms, including one of the largest, Humana Corporation.
These people and some of the biggest names in Silicon Valley legal circles have committed or are involved in multiple crimes.
For the next decade or two, we're going to explore the crimes that these people committed, the motivations and the denial involved, the background and histories that led each person to make the choices that they did, and ways to build upon what happened and move towards positive societal goals.
There's plenty to go over. These people committed or were involved in: Spousal abuse, child abuse, DDOS (a highly prosecutable violation of CFAA), extortion, perjury, conspiracy to commit perjury (a possible felony), false police reports, conspiracy to file false police reports (a possible felony), unlawful threats, barratry, defamation, malpractice, civil harassment, criminal harassment, abuse of process, and violations of SCCBA Professional Standards.
The point was to force Jim's oldest son and victim, me, to sign a gag order. I was in a wheelchair. I'd never made a single inappropriate threat against my abuser. I wasn't even asked to not to call anybody. But Jim threatened to put me in a violence database unless I agreed never to write about him.
I won the right to write, but I lost my home of 25 years, most of my possessions, my chances for retirement, everything. Everything but a realization.
I can make a difference. I can conduct research for legitimate and reasonable purposes, document what happened, and analyze the choices of the people involved:
- Grace Kiraly, abuse victim and Christ Follower.
- Gail Cheda, slightly demented Realtor, spittle flying.
- Tom Stutzman of Thomas Chase Stutzman, a Family Law attorney whose hobbies include martial arts and alleged sexual harassment
- John Perrott of Thomas Chase Stutzman, a personable albeit lazy Family Law attorney who has a slight tendency towards fraud and malpractice
- Chris Burdick, head of the Santa Clara County Bar Association (SCCBA). Chris, you broke a written promise to speak with me because, you said, we had “Prior...” You didn't finish the sentence. Were you worried that I might take false statements to the State Bar? What's the deal with you and Hoge Fenton, anyway? What will we find if we dig?
- Tracie Zerr of Thomas Chase Stutzman, a woman of boundless intelligence and sensitivity.
Maggie told me that she didn't know what she could say to me about what happened. However, we have decades to work it out. It will be productive. I'd like to direct the attention of attorneys and other parties to the:
Questions or comments are welcome. For technical notes and disclaimers, click here.
The current free ebook is located at this link:
For details about the ebook, click here.
The point? “The story is already out there, idiots. Keep it up and I'll demonstrate how something known as decentralized distribution works.”
130813. The LittleCoder did not understand the words “ironic” and “irony”. Were clothes and a board involved, he wondered? Or was this about some type of metal? But I understand irony now.
Let's look at two current examples. I think of them as the Kiraly Cases Ironies.
Jim Kiraly of Transamerica, my abuser, and Tom Kiraly of Humana Corporation, my Brother, sought to prevent me from “gathering information” about the Kiraly Family. These people also fought to charge me $5,000 per consensual phone call, including calls made to news media, if I was bold enough to “discuss” the Kiraly Family with third parties.
This part of the Kiraly Cases happened because I spoke with Grace Kiraly's Pastor, with Grace's permission, regarding the nature of a Christ Follower. And I talked with Jim Kiraly's volunteer group, Service Core Of Retired Executives, or S.C.O.R.E., about the nature of altruism.
Jim Kiraly assumed I'd mentioned the abuse that he committed to these people. My perspective is that Jim could at least have asked the Church in question and S.C.O.R.E. about the nature of the discussions before he decided to come after me.
Communications that I made to a number of people after the Kiraly Cases started may have played a role in Jim Kiraly's panic and fury. Regardless, when Jim and Tom lied under oath, broke my health, and smashed my life into pieces, what did they think was going to happen?
I gather that I was supposed to evaporate. Not likely. Future litigation will make no difference. Jim Kiraly and Tom Kiraly can use their connections and their wealth to exploit holes in the legal system. They can bankrupt me. But they can't have what they wish.
This is where the Kiraly Cases Ironies kick in.
First, the Kiraly Cases, taking threats of future litigation against me into account, mean that when I engage in consensual discussions with third parties who may or may not be familiar with Kiraly Family members, I should proceed as described in points #1 and #2 below:
1. It seems to me that, to protect myself legally, I should be reasonably transparent. I should make it clear that communications are not intended to be attempts to contact Kiraly Family members directly or indirectly. As part of this, I should explain that the Kiraly Cases occurred and exactly what the cases were about.
It is probably best if no details related to the Kiraly Cases are omitted.
2. For reasons connected to transparency, I should probably post some, not necessarily all, of the steps that I take to “gather information” publicly as well as some, not necessarily all, of the information that is obtained.
The goal is to proceed as a Reasonable Person might proceed. At any rate, the Kiraly Family has forced me to take steps that I did not originally plan to take. Steps that may be inconsistent with the goals that my abuser fought for.
This is ironic. But there is a second Kiraly Cases Irony.
It is important for legal reasons that as I “gather information” related to the Kiralys and others involved in the Kiraly Cases, I proceed based on “legitimate purposes”. However, there are numerous such purposes. See the following document:
If I remember correctly, during the Kiraly Cases I offered to agree to significant limits on communications with third parties. Even though I had no legal or ethical obligations to do so.
My offer was rejected.
Since I have numerous “legitimate purposes” for communications with third parties and for the “gathering” of Kiraly-related “information” in general and I need only one such purpose, the Kiraly Family's rejection of my offer means that there are very few limits involved in the process.
It was the “choice” of the Kiraly Family. This is ironic too.