Skip to main content


Are you ready to go down the rabbit hole? To visit a surreal world, where black is white and white is carrots?

A friend, Metacognician in Shanghai, describes the situation as follows: “Life is more absurd than movies. I've gone down the rabbit hole too, when it just becomes more and more strange and you wonder how that all is supposed to make sense.” I asked him if I should just embrace it. He answered, “Why should you ... change the universe?”

It started with a psychotic named Jim Kiraly who resides, we think, at 6329 Twinberry Circle, Avila Beach, California.

Jim Kiraly is a respected citizen. A churchgoer. A Vice President of Transamerica Corporation. And a violent abuser who tried to use an emergency anti-violence measure, one intended to protect battered women, to stop his victim in a wheelchair from writing a book.

Concise enough? :)

For attorneys: Jim Kiraly filed for CLETS against his son and victim, who lived 200 miles away, did not own a car, and was in a wheelchair. His son and victim was not asked to end communications. Jim had no (zero) specific and relevant allegations that were not perjury. But he turned down repeated offers of no-contact and a signed stipulation that gave him everything but CLETS. He insisted on CLETS if his victim ever once “discussed” him with third parties.

In the end, Jim Kiraly signed an agreement far weaker than the ones he'd been offered.

A review of Court paperwork and other materials will tend to confirm that Jim and other parties, including attorneys on all sides, committed multiple felonies, crimes, and faux pas. :P

The word “abuser” is stated here publicly and without equivocation. A formal offer is hereby made to reaffirm the word in writing and under oath. Attorneys will understand the significance of the point. In short, there is little terror of a threatened defamation suit on this side. Actually, we feel that such a suit will fit nicely up Jim Kiraly's abuser ass.

Jim has one son, Ken Kiraly, who invented the Amazon Kindle and is one of the leads at Amazon's secret Lab126. Another son, Tom Kiraly is one of the leads, a Vice President-CFO type, at medical insurance firms, including one of the largest, Humana Corporation.

These people and some of the biggest names in Silicon Valley legal circles have committed or are involved in multiple crimes.

For the next decade or two, we're going to explore the crimes that these people committed, the motivations and the denial involved, the background and histories that led each person to make the choices that they did, and ways to build upon what happened and move towards positive societal goals.

There's plenty to go over. These people committed or were involved in: Spousal abuse, child abuse, DDOS (a highly prosecutable violation of CFAA), extortion, perjury, conspiracy to commit perjury (a possible felony), false police reports, conspiracy to file false police reports (a possible felony), unlawful threats, barratry, defamation, malpractice, civil harassment, criminal harassment, abuse of process, and violations of SCCBA Professional Standards.

The point was to force Jim's oldest son and victim, me, to sign a gag order. I was in a wheelchair. I'd never made a single inappropriate threat against my abuser. I wasn't even asked to not to call anybody. But Jim threatened to put me in a violence database unless I agreed never to write about him.

I won the right to write, but I lost my home of 25 years, most of my possessions, my chances for retirement, everything. Everything but a realization.

I can make a difference. I can conduct research for legitimate and reasonable purposes, document what happened, and analyze the choices of the people involved:

Maggie told me that she didn't know what she could say to me about what happened. However, we have decades to work it out. It will be productive. I'd like to direct the attention of attorneys and other parties to the:

Legitimate and Reasonable Purposes List

Questions or comments are welcome. For technical notes and disclaimers, click here.

Free Downloads

The current free ebook is located at this link:

For details about the ebook, click here.

The point? “The story is already out there, idiots. Keep it up and I'll demonstrate how something known as decentralized distribution works.”


Friday 2012-12-21 — Michael Bonetto and This Blog

121221. This blog is of interest to Michael Bonetto. I'll explain one reason why.

To win CLETS, as I understand it, Michael would normally be expected to demonstrate that I am a physical danger to James Kiraly, my father, and Thomas Kiraly, my brother. This might prove to be a problem for Michael, because:

  1. I have never committed or threatened physical violence against James or Thomas in over four decades

  2. Both James and Thomas have either committed or threatened physical violence against me during this period

  3. Michael Bonetto and his clients have misrepresented or lied about most aspects of the Kiraly cases

  4. In fact, Michael Bonetto and his clients have told numerous stories that sound vaguely frightening but, to the best of my knowledge, they have never made a single specific allegation of a serious nature that is not a lie.

So, Michael Bonetto has sort of stepped in REDACTED. As the Kiraly Cases head towards Long Cause, he doesn't have many options.

My understanding is that Michael may try to distract attention from the facts listed above. Specifically, he may focus on this weblog. And on its contents, which I distribute for multiple lawful and appropriate purposes.

As this weblog does not threaten or endorse violence, and in fact opposes it, Michael Bonetto may have his work cut out for him. He will most likely try to show that the domain names used are “harassment” of some sort and that “harassment” justifies CLETS to protect against physical violence even in a situation where his clients are the only parties who have committed or threatened such violence.

It may be possible to turn Michael's foolishness to my advantage. Do any of my readers know of an attorney with a strong interest in First Amendment issues who might be willing to work with Ioannes or myself on a reduced cost basis?

Attorneys with backgrounds of various different types would be useful. For contact information, click here.